vectorize
Low-resolution logo recovery

A small logo can be traced. Missing design information cannot.

Judge what the pixels still prove, compare the trace at detail and use size, and stop before automatic cleanup turns uncertainty into false geometry.

512 PX SOURCE
Slack logo traced from the 512 pixel benchmark source
99.34% region overlap
128 PX SOURCE
Slack logo traced from the 128 pixel benchmark source
97.38% region overlap
This simple four-color mark keeps all eight components at both source sizes. The lower-resolution trace is less accurate around the edges, but its structure survives.
Short answer

Find the best source first. Trace only what remains legible.

Enlarging a small raster does not restore the approved curves, counters or letterforms. A useful vectorization preserves visible structure; it does not pretend to know details the source no longer contains.

Before tracing

The fastest improvement is often finding a different file.

A logo that looks tiny in a document may still exist as vector artwork inside it. Preserve that geometry instead of exporting a screenshot and trying to reconstruct it.

  • Open PDFs and design files in a vector editor before rasterizing them.
  • Look for an SVG logo in the website header or official media kit.
  • Ask the brand owner, sponsor or original designer for the master artwork.
  • Prefer a tightly cropped source over a large screenshot where the logo is tiny.
Measured failure

Complex details disappear before the whole logo looks broken.

In the same benchmark, the Starbucks trace loses more agreement at 128 px and fails the topology check at both sizes. More pixels help, but they do not make this detailed mark an automatic approval.

512 PX SOURCE
Starbucks logo traced from the 512 pixel benchmark source
97.75% overlap · topology mismatch
128 PX SOURCE
Starbucks logo traced from the 128 pixel benchmark source
89.44% overlap · topology mismatch
Region overlap measures rendered color agreement, not brand correctness. The topology result catches missing or invented openings that a single percentage can hide.

Read the definitions, source manifest and limitations in the complete benchmark.

Decision table

Match the intervention to the evidence.

“Low resolution” is not one condition. A simple icon with visible gaps is different from compressed lettering whose original strokes can no longer be identified.

Recommended action for common low-resolution logo conditions
What remains visibleRecommended action
Edges are soft, but the silhouette and gaps are still unambiguousTrace, then compare every important opening and corner
Small text is readable but visibly distortedTrace shapes; rebuild the lettering from the approved typeface
Letters, holes or symbols merge into the same pixelsFind a better source or redraw from a verified reference
The only file is a compressed screenshot of a complex markDo not invent missing brand geometry with automatic cleanup
Review at two scales

Zoom reveals defects. Use size reveals consequences.

  • At high zoom, compare sharp corners, curves, counters and detached specks.
  • At header or favicon size, confirm that gaps do not close and letters remain distinguishable.
  • Check the source and SVG side by side; a clean-looking trace may still change the design.
  • Treat sampled colors as observations, not approved brand values.
Sources and evidence

What this guide relies on